[Part 1] [Part 2]
In Luke 11.14-21 the evangelist has demonstrated great fidelity in his work. His text is in close agreement with the independent Matthean tradition. Additionally, he has preserved an obscure word, a redundant clause, and a difficult Hebraism.
These last two things also tell us that Luke has gotten us very close to the [...]
Archive for May, 2009
The Finger of God and the Kingdom, 3
Posted in Gospels, New Testament, tagged beelzebul, decalogue, finger of god, gospel of luke, historical jesus, kingdom of god, prophet on May 15, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
Nomenclature Redivivus
Posted in Uncategorized, tagged bibliology, bipartite, canon, nomenclature, terminology on May 7, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
I’ve been thinking about a minor, unresolved issue for me relating to the terms we use for the two parts of the Bible. When I wrote on this before (see Nomenclature) I had forgotten an option I came across when reading John Goldingay’s Models for Interpretation of Scripture. A footnote lead me to an earlier [...]
Postmodern Jesus
Posted in Gospels, New Testament, tagged christology, historical jesus, postmodernism on May 5, 2009 | Leave a Comment »
Silviu N. Tatu at WP weblog Studiul Vechiului Testament wrote something (in Romanian, be forewarned) here about yet another book attempting to wipe away the encrusted religious establishment and revealing a relevant Jesus. Tatu notes not only the myopia of emphasizing the brighter, easier biblical doctrines, but the danger of the church using this partial [...]